whatcanGOwrong
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
||||
Architecture of the library
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph RL
|
||||
Program --> ProgramSpec --> ELF
|
||||
btf.Spec --> ELF
|
||||
Map --> MapSpec --> ELF
|
||||
Links --> Map & Program
|
||||
ProgramSpec -.-> btf.Spec
|
||||
MapSpec -.-> btf.Spec
|
||||
subgraph Collection
|
||||
Program & Map
|
||||
end
|
||||
subgraph CollectionSpec
|
||||
ProgramSpec & MapSpec & btf.Spec
|
||||
end
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
ELF
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
BPF is usually produced by using Clang to compile a subset of C. Clang outputs
|
||||
an ELF file which contains program byte code (aka BPF), but also metadata for
|
||||
maps used by the program. The metadata follows the conventions set by libbpf
|
||||
shipped with the kernel. Certain ELF sections have special meaning
|
||||
and contain structures defined by libbpf. Newer versions of clang emit
|
||||
additional metadata in [BPF Type Format](#BTF).
|
||||
|
||||
The library aims to be compatible with libbpf so that moving from a C toolchain
|
||||
to a Go one creates little friction. To that end, the [ELF reader](elf_reader.go)
|
||||
is tested against the Linux selftests and avoids introducing custom behaviour
|
||||
if possible.
|
||||
|
||||
The output of the ELF reader is a `CollectionSpec` which encodes
|
||||
all of the information contained in the ELF in a form that is easy to work with
|
||||
in Go. The returned `CollectionSpec` should be deterministic: reading the same ELF
|
||||
file on different systems must produce the same output.
|
||||
As a corollary, any changes that depend on the runtime environment like the
|
||||
current kernel version must happen when creating [Objects](#Objects).
|
||||
|
||||
Specifications
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
`CollectionSpec` is a very simple container for `ProgramSpec`, `MapSpec` and
|
||||
`btf.Spec`. Avoid adding functionality to it if possible.
|
||||
|
||||
`ProgramSpec` and `MapSpec` are blueprints for in-kernel
|
||||
objects and contain everything necessary to execute the relevant `bpf(2)`
|
||||
syscalls. They refer to `btf.Spec` for type information such as `Map` key and
|
||||
value types.
|
||||
|
||||
The [asm](asm/) package provides an assembler that can be used to generate
|
||||
`ProgramSpec` on the fly.
|
||||
|
||||
Objects
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
`Program` and `Map` are the result of loading specifications into the kernel.
|
||||
Features that depend on knowledge of the current system (e.g kernel version)
|
||||
are implemented at this point.
|
||||
|
||||
Sometimes loading a spec will fail because the kernel is too old, or a feature is not
|
||||
enabled. There are multiple ways the library deals with that:
|
||||
|
||||
* Fallback: older kernels don't allow naming programs and maps. The library
|
||||
automatically detects support for names, and omits them during load if
|
||||
necessary. This works since name is primarily a debug aid.
|
||||
|
||||
* Sentinel error: sometimes it's possible to detect that a feature isn't available.
|
||||
In that case the library will return an error wrapping `ErrNotSupported`.
|
||||
This is also useful to skip tests that can't run on the current kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
Once program and map objects are loaded they expose the kernel's low-level API,
|
||||
e.g. `NextKey`. Often this API is awkward to use in Go, so there are safer
|
||||
wrappers on top of the low-level API, like `MapIterator`. The low-level API is
|
||||
useful when our higher-level API doesn't support a particular use case.
|
||||
|
||||
Links
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Programs can be attached to many different points in the kernel and newer BPF hooks
|
||||
tend to use bpf_link to do so. Older hooks unfortunately use a combination of
|
||||
syscalls, netlink messages, etc. Adding support for a new link type should not
|
||||
pull in large dependencies like netlink, so XDP programs or tracepoints are
|
||||
out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
Each bpf_link_type has one corresponding Go type, e.g. `link.tracing` corresponds
|
||||
to BPF_LINK_TRACING. In general, these types should be unexported as long as they
|
||||
don't export methods outside of the Link interface. Each Go type may have multiple
|
||||
exported constructors. For example `AttachTracing` and `AttachLSM` create a
|
||||
tracing link, but are distinct functions since they may require different arguments.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user