Hermes-agent
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,716 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for evaluate_credits_notices — pure threshold reconciliation policy (L4.1).
|
||||
|
||||
All tests use fresh latch = {"active": set(), "seen_below_90": False, "usage_band": None} per scenario.
|
||||
CreditsState is constructed directly (not parsed from headers).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import (
|
||||
CREDITS_NOTICE_KIND,
|
||||
CREDITS_RESTORED_TTL_MS,
|
||||
AgentNotice,
|
||||
CreditsState,
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def fresh_latch() -> dict:
|
||||
return {"active": set(), "seen_below_90": False, "usage_band": None}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def state_with_fraction(
|
||||
uf: float | None,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
paid_access: bool = True,
|
||||
denominator_kind: str = "subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros: int = 0,
|
||||
purchased_usd: str = "0.00",
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd: str | None = "20.00",
|
||||
) -> CreditsState:
|
||||
"""Build a minimal CreditsState that yields the desired used_fraction.
|
||||
|
||||
used_fraction = (limit - subscription_micros) / limit
|
||||
|
||||
When uf is None, we set limit to None so used_fraction returns None.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if uf is None:
|
||||
return CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=None,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd=None,
|
||||
subscription_micros=0,
|
||||
denominator_kind="none",
|
||||
paid_access=paid_access,
|
||||
purchased_micros=purchased_micros,
|
||||
purchased_usd=purchased_usd,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# We want (limit - sub) / limit == uf → sub = limit * (1 - uf)
|
||||
limit = 20_000_000 # $20 in micros
|
||||
sub = int(limit * (1.0 - uf))
|
||||
return CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=limit,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd=subscription_limit_usd,
|
||||
subscription_micros=sub,
|
||||
denominator_kind=denominator_kind,
|
||||
paid_access=paid_access,
|
||||
purchased_micros=purchased_micros,
|
||||
purchased_usd=purchased_usd,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 1: crossing 90% threshold ───────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestWarn90Crossing:
|
||||
def test_below_lowest_band_no_notice_but_latch_set(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(0.10) # below the 50% band
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
assert latch["seen_below_90"] is True
|
||||
|
||||
def test_crossing_to_90_fires_once(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# First call: uf < 0.5 — sets seen_below_90 (below lowest band)
|
||||
s1 = state_with_fraction(0.10)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(s1, latch)
|
||||
# Second call: uf >= 0.9 — should fire the usage band at 90
|
||||
s2 = state_with_fraction(0.95)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s2, latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_refire_on_repeated_over_90(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s_below = state_with_fraction(0.10)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(s_below, latch)
|
||||
s_over = state_with_fraction(0.95)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(s_over, latch)
|
||||
# Third call: still ≥ 0.9 — must NOT re-fire
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s_over, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 2: recovery + re-cross ──────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestWarn90RecoveryReCross:
|
||||
def test_recovery_clears_warn90(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# Cross below → above
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
# Recovery: uf drops back below ALL bands → usage notice clears entirely
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in latch["active"]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recross_after_recovery_fires_again(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch) # recovery
|
||||
# Re-cross: uf >= 0.9 again — should fire again because the band is clearable
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in keys
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 3: open-already-over (hybrid Q3 gate) ───────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestOpenAlreadyOver:
|
||||
def test_warn90_does_not_fire_without_seen_below_90(self):
|
||||
"""First call uf≥0.9 with seen_below_90=False — warn90 must NOT fire."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
assert latch["seen_below_90"] is False
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(0.95)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 3b: boundary — exact 0.9 and just-below-1.0 ────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestBoundaryFractions:
|
||||
def test_exact_0_9_fires_warn90(self):
|
||||
"""used_fraction == 0.9 exactly must fire warn90 (threshold is inclusive)."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# First: prime seen_below_90 with a sub-50% observation
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
# Now construct a state where used_fraction is EXACTLY 0.9:
|
||||
# subscription_limit_micros=20_000_000, subscription_micros=2_000_000
|
||||
# → used = 18_000_000 / 20_000_000 = 0.9 exactly
|
||||
s = CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=20_000_000,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd="20.00",
|
||||
subscription_micros=2_000_000,
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
paid_access=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert s.used_fraction == 0.9
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
def test_just_below_1_0_does_not_fire_grant_spent(self):
|
||||
"""subscription_micros = limit - 1 (used_fraction just under 1.0) must NOT fire grant_spent.
|
||||
|
||||
Locks the boundary so a future used_fraction clamp refactor cannot fire
|
||||
grant_spent a micro early.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
limit = 20_000_000
|
||||
s = CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=limit,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd="20.00",
|
||||
subscription_micros=1, # limit - 1 → used_fraction < 1.0
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=5_000_000,
|
||||
purchased_usd="5.00",
|
||||
paid_access=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert s.used_fraction is not None and s.used_fraction < 1.0
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.grant_spent" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 4: grant_spent ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestGrantSpent:
|
||||
def _grant_state(self, purchased_micros: int = 12_340_000) -> CreditsState:
|
||||
return state_with_fraction(
|
||||
1.0,
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=purchased_micros,
|
||||
purchased_usd="12.34",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_spent_fires_on_first_obs(self):
|
||||
"""No crossing gate for grant_spent — fires immediately on first obs."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(self._grant_state(), latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" in keys
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_spent_no_refire(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(self._grant_state(), latch)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(self._grant_state(), latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.grant_spent" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_spent_clears_when_purchased_zero(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(self._grant_state(), latch)
|
||||
# Now purchased → 0: grant_cond becomes False
|
||||
s_no_purchase = state_with_fraction(
|
||||
1.0,
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=0,
|
||||
purchased_usd="0.00",
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s_no_purchase, latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" in to_clear
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.grant_spent" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 5: depleted + recovery ──────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDepleted:
|
||||
def test_depleted_fires_level_error_kind_sticky(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = CreditsState(paid_access=False)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
depleted_notices = [n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.depleted"]
|
||||
assert len(depleted_notices) == 1
|
||||
n = depleted_notices[0]
|
||||
assert n.level == "error"
|
||||
assert n.kind == CREDITS_NOTICE_KIND
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recovery_emits_clear_and_restored(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# Fire depleted
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
# Now recovered
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=True), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in to_clear
|
||||
restored = [n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.restored"]
|
||||
assert len(restored) == 1
|
||||
r = restored[0]
|
||||
assert r.level == "success"
|
||||
assert r.kind == "ttl"
|
||||
assert r.ttl_ms == CREDITS_RESTORED_TTL_MS
|
||||
|
||||
def test_depleted_refires_after_recovery(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=True), latch)
|
||||
# Goes depleted again
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in keys
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 5b: free-model suppression of the depleted notice ───────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDepletedFreeModelSuppression:
|
||||
def test_depleted_suppressed_when_model_is_free(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = CreditsState(paid_access=False)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch, model_is_free=True)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.depleted" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" not in latch["active"]
|
||||
assert to_clear == []
|
||||
|
||||
def test_switch_to_free_model_clears_without_restored(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# Depleted on a paid model → notice fires
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in latch["active"]
|
||||
# Same depleted account, but now on a free model → clear, NO "restored"
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch, model_is_free=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" not in latch["active"]
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.restored" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_switch_back_to_paid_model_while_depleted_reshows(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch, model_is_free=True)
|
||||
# Back on a paid model, still depleted → notice re-fires
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in latch["active"]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_genuine_recovery_on_free_model_no_spurious_restored(self):
|
||||
"""Recovery observed while suppressed (notice never shown) → nothing to
|
||||
clear, no 'restored' (there was no visible depleted state to restore)."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch, model_is_free=True)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=True), latch, model_is_free=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert to_clear == []
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.restored" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_genuine_recovery_still_emits_restored_when_notice_active(self):
|
||||
"""paid_access flip back to True with the notice showing → clear + restored
|
||||
(unchanged behaviour, regardless of the model-free flag)."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(CreditsState(paid_access=False), latch)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=True), latch, model_is_free=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in to_clear
|
||||
restored = [n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.restored"]
|
||||
assert len(restored) == 1
|
||||
|
||||
def test_free_flag_does_not_affect_other_notices(self):
|
||||
"""Usage-band and grant notices are independent of the model-free gate."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch, model_is_free=True)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95, paid_access=False), latch, model_is_free=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" not in keys
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 5c: is_free_tier_model (local-data-only check) ──────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIsFreeTierModel:
|
||||
def test_free_suffix_is_free(self):
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import is_free_tier_model
|
||||
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra:free") is True
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("Hermes-4-70B:free", "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com") is True
|
||||
|
||||
def test_empty_or_paid_model_is_not_free(self):
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import is_free_tier_model
|
||||
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("") is False
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("Hermes-4-405B") is False
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pricing_cache_peek_zero_priced_model(self, monkeypatch):
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import is_free_tier_model
|
||||
import hermes_cli.models as models_mod
|
||||
|
||||
# The picker keys the cache on the pre-/v1 root (get_pricing_for_provider
|
||||
# strips a trailing /v1 before fetch_models_with_pricing).
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
models_mod,
|
||||
"_pricing_cache",
|
||||
{
|
||||
"https://inference-api.nousresearch.com": {
|
||||
"some/zero-priced": {"prompt": "0", "completion": "0"},
|
||||
"some/paid": {"prompt": "0.000001", "completion": "0.000002"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
# The agent holds the /v1-suffixed URL (DEFAULT_NOUS_INFERENCE_URL) —
|
||||
# the helper must normalize it down to the picker's cache key.
|
||||
base = "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com/v1"
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/zero-priced", base) is True
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/paid", base) is False
|
||||
# Pre-stripped and trailing-slash variants resolve to the same key.
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/zero-priced", "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com/") is True
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/zero-priced", "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com/v1/") is True
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cache_miss_is_not_free_and_no_fetch(self, monkeypatch):
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import is_free_tier_model
|
||||
import hermes_cli.models as models_mod
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(models_mod, "_pricing_cache", {})
|
||||
|
||||
def _boom(*args, **kwargs): # any network attempt fails the test
|
||||
raise AssertionError("is_free_tier_model must never hit the network")
|
||||
|
||||
import urllib.request
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(urllib.request, "urlopen", _boom)
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/model", "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com/v1") is False
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exception_fails_open_to_false(self, monkeypatch):
|
||||
from agent.credits_tracker import is_free_tier_model
|
||||
import hermes_cli.models as models_mod
|
||||
|
||||
class _Exploding:
|
||||
def get(self, *_a, **_kw):
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("boom")
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(models_mod, "_pricing_cache", _Exploding())
|
||||
assert is_free_tier_model("some/model", "https://inference-api.nousresearch.com") is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 6: denominator none (uf is None) ────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDenominatorNone:
|
||||
def test_no_warn90_when_uf_none(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(None)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_grant_spent_when_uf_none(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=None,
|
||||
denominator_kind="none",
|
||||
purchased_micros=5_000_000,
|
||||
purchased_usd="5.00",
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.grant_spent" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_warn90_clears_when_uf_becomes_none(self):
|
||||
"""If warn90 was active and uf becomes None, it should clear."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# Establish usage notice active: cross below → above
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in latch["active"]
|
||||
# Now uf becomes None (denominator changed to "none")
|
||||
s_none = state_with_fraction(None)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s_none, latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in latch["active"]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 7: copy / verbatim USD strings ──────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestNoticeCopy:
|
||||
def test_warn90_contains_verbatim_subscription_limit_usd(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(0.95, subscription_limit_usd="20.00")
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
warn_notice = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.usage")
|
||||
assert "$20.00" in warn_notice.text
|
||||
assert "cap" in warn_notice.text
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_spent_contains_verbatim_purchased_usd(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(
|
||||
1.0,
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=12_340_000,
|
||||
purchased_usd="12.34",
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
grant_notice = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.grant_spent")
|
||||
assert "$12.34" in grant_notice.text
|
||||
assert "top-up left" in grant_notice.text
|
||||
|
||||
def test_depleted_mentions_credits_command(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = CreditsState(paid_access=False)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
depleted_notice = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.depleted")
|
||||
assert "/credits" in depleted_notice.text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 8: severity order in a single call ──────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSeverityOrder:
|
||||
def test_multiple_new_notices_ordered_ascending_severity(self):
|
||||
"""grant_spent < depleted in to_show when both fire in one call.
|
||||
|
||||
(usage is suppressed here: purchased>0 — see TestTopUpSuppression.
|
||||
usage + grant_spent are now mutually exclusive by design.)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
latch = {"active": set(), "seen_below_90": True, "usage_band": None}
|
||||
|
||||
# Build state: subscription_cap, uf >= 1.0, purchased_micros > 0, NOT paid_access
|
||||
# grant_cond: subscription_cap + uf >= 1.0 + purchased > 0 ✓
|
||||
# depleted_cond: not paid_access ✓
|
||||
# usage band: suppressed (purchased > 0)
|
||||
s = CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=20_000_000,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd="20.00",
|
||||
subscription_micros=0, # uf = 1.0
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=5_000_000,
|
||||
purchased_usd="5.00",
|
||||
paid_access=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in keys
|
||||
# Ascending severity: grant_spent before depleted
|
||||
assert keys.index("credits.grant_spent") < keys.index("credits.depleted")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_usage_before_depleted_without_topup(self):
|
||||
"""With no top-up funds, usage fires and precedes depleted."""
|
||||
latch = {"active": set(), "seen_below_90": True, "usage_band": None}
|
||||
s = CreditsState(
|
||||
subscription_limit_micros=20_000_000,
|
||||
subscription_limit_usd="20.00",
|
||||
subscription_micros=0, # uf = 1.0
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=0,
|
||||
purchased_usd="0.00",
|
||||
paid_access=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.depleted" in keys
|
||||
assert keys.index("credits.usage") < keys.index("credits.depleted")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 8b: top-up suppression of the usage gauge ───────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestTopUpSuppression:
|
||||
"""purchased_micros > 0 suppresses the sub-cap usage gauge: the cap is the
|
||||
wrong denominator for an account that can keep spending top-up funds."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_usage_band_with_topup_at_90pct(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.10, purchased_micros=5_000_000, purchased_usd="5.00"),
|
||||
latch,
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95, purchased_micros=5_000_000, purchased_usd="5.00"),
|
||||
latch,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] is None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_topup_landing_mid_session_clears_active_band(self):
|
||||
"""A showing 90% warn must clear when a top-up lands (purchased 0 → >0)."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 90
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95, purchased_micros=10_000_000, purchased_usd="10.00"),
|
||||
latch,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] is None
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_band_resumes_after_topup_spent(self):
|
||||
"""purchased back to 0 with usage still in-band → gauge resumes."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95, purchased_micros=10_000_000, purchased_usd="10.00"),
|
||||
latch,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] is None
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
n = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.usage")
|
||||
assert "90%" in n.text
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 90
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_spent_still_fires_with_topup(self):
|
||||
"""Suppression only affects the gauge — grant_spent (which NEEDS purchased>0)
|
||||
is untouched."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = state_with_fraction(
|
||||
1.0,
|
||||
denominator_kind="subscription_cap",
|
||||
purchased_micros=12_340_000,
|
||||
purchased_usd="12.34",
|
||||
)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
keys = [n.key for n in to_show]
|
||||
assert "credits.grant_spent" in keys
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in keys
|
||||
|
||||
def test_depleted_unaffected_by_topup_suppression(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
s = CreditsState(paid_access=False, purchased_micros=5_000_000, purchased_usd="5.00")
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
assert any(n.key == "credits.depleted" for n in to_show)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Invariant: never fire + clear same key in one call ────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestNoFireAndClearSameKey:
|
||||
def test_usage_never_both_fired_and_cleared(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
# Run many state transitions; across each, assert no key is in both lists
|
||||
states = [
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.10),
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95),
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.10),
|
||||
state_with_fraction(0.95),
|
||||
state_with_fraction(None),
|
||||
]
|
||||
for s in states:
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
fired_keys = {n.key for n in to_show}
|
||||
cleared_keys = set(to_clear)
|
||||
overlap = fired_keys & cleared_keys
|
||||
assert not overlap, f"Key(s) both fired and cleared: {overlap}"
|
||||
|
||||
def test_depleted_never_both_fired_and_cleared(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
states = [
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=False),
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=True),
|
||||
CreditsState(paid_access=False),
|
||||
]
|
||||
for s in states:
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(s, latch)
|
||||
fired_keys = {n.key for n in to_show}
|
||||
cleared_keys = set(to_clear)
|
||||
overlap = fired_keys & cleared_keys
|
||||
assert not overlap, f"Key(s) both fired and cleared: {overlap}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ── Scenario 9: escalating usage bands (50 → 75 → 90) ────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestUsageBands:
|
||||
"""The usage notice shows the HIGHEST crossed band as a single escalating line."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _band_text(self, to_show):
|
||||
n = next((n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.usage"), None)
|
||||
return n.text if n else None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_50_band_fires_info(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch) # prime
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.55), latch)
|
||||
n = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.usage")
|
||||
assert "50%" in n.text and n.level == "info"
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 50
|
||||
|
||||
def test_75_band_fires_warn(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.80), latch)
|
||||
n = next(n for n in to_show if n.key == "credits.usage")
|
||||
assert "75%" in n.text and n.level == "warn"
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 75
|
||||
|
||||
def test_climb_replaces_band(self):
|
||||
"""Climbing 50→75→90 replaces the single line (clear old + show new)."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
# 55% → 50 band
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.55), latch)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 50
|
||||
# 80% → climbs to 75, clearing the 50 line
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.80), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "75%" in self._band_text(to_show)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 75
|
||||
# 95% → climbs to 90
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "90%" in self._band_text(to_show)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 90
|
||||
|
||||
def test_step_down_on_recovery(self):
|
||||
"""Recovering steps the band back down, then clears below the lowest band."""
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.95), latch)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == 90
|
||||
# drop to 80% → steps down to 75
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.80), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert "75%" in self._band_text(to_show)
|
||||
# drop to 55% → steps down to 50
|
||||
to_show, _ = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.55), latch)
|
||||
assert "50%" in self._band_text(to_show)
|
||||
# drop below 50% → clears entirely
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" in to_clear
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] is None
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_refire_same_band(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.10), latch)
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.80), latch) # fires 75
|
||||
# still 80% → same band, no re-emit, no clear
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.80), latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert "credits.usage" not in to_clear
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_band_boundaries_inclusive(self):
|
||||
"""Thresholds are inclusive: exactly 0.50 / 0.75 / 0.90 land in their band."""
|
||||
for uf, want in [(0.50, 50), (0.75, 75), (0.90, 90)]:
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
latch["seen_below_90"] = True # allow firing
|
||||
evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(uf), latch)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] == want, (uf, latch["usage_band"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_open_below_lowest_band_no_notice(self):
|
||||
latch = fresh_latch()
|
||||
to_show, to_clear = evaluate_credits_notices(state_with_fraction(0.30), latch)
|
||||
assert all(n.key != "credits.usage" for n in to_show)
|
||||
assert latch["usage_band"] is None
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user